Most teams have Copilot or Claude installed. But engineers are still babysitting every output and rewriting half of it. The problem isn't the model — it's how your team is using it. I find the gap and close it.
Audit: 2–3 days|Training: ~1 week|Your team is shipping differently by Friday
If any of these sound familiar, your team is on the wrong side of that gap.
I spent an hour getting Copilot to generate that module and then another hour fixing everything it got wrong.
Half my day is reviewing AI-generated PRs from juniors that look right at first glance but break in weird ways.
It's great for throwaway scripts. But on our actual codebase? It doesn't know our patterns. The output is useless.
We bought Copilot for everyone six months ago. Usage dropped after the first two weeks. Nobody talks about it anymore.
You've seen the LinkedIn posts — teams claiming 10x output, companies shipping with half the headcount. And your team's experience looks nothing like that. So you start to wonder if it's all hype. It's not. The gap between your results and theirs is specific, diagnosable, and fixable.
I come in, diagnose exactly where your team stands, and train them to close the gap. No multi-month timelines. No bloated SOWs.
I dig into your repos, CI/CD pipeline, and existing AI setup. I'm looking at how your codebase is structured for AI to succeed — or fail — and what tools your team has access to versus what they're actually using.
I watch how your engineers actually work with AI in the codebase. Not interviews — real observation. I see where they're getting stuck, where they're fighting the tool, and where the process breaks down.
A clear, prioritized report: here's where your team stands, here's the gap, here's exactly what it would take to close it. No jargon, no fluff — a document you can hand to your CTO or VP of Engineering.
A live session covering the principles behind why AI falls short for most teams and the mental model shift required to make it a reliable tool. I tailor this to your stack, your codebase, and the specific gaps I found in the audit.
I work with your team to implement the specific configurations, documentation, and patterns your codebase needs for AI to produce high-quality output consistently. This is the system — not just knowledge transfer.
I pair with your engineers on real tasks from your backlog. We work through actual tickets together so they experience the difference firsthand. This is where the "aha moment" happens — when they see their own code coming back right the first time.
Documentation of everything we set up, a playbook for maintaining and evolving it, and a 30-day check-in to answer questions and troubleshoot anything that's come up since.
I'm not someone who read about AI last year and started consulting. I've shipped production code at the companies your engineers want to work at.
Built the frontend for the Amazon App Store
Established TDD patterns for the Sam's Club mobile team
Improved performance of their product page
Joined at seed stage with 10 people, helped scale engineering to 35+ employees and $5M ARR over six years
Built the AI context system so effective I automated myself out of the CTO role. $1M+ profitable in under 2 years.
I'll walk through what 10x AI output looks like on a real codebase. Then we'll scope the audit for your team. No pitch deck — just a screen share and an honest conversation.
Get in Touch